Welcome Guest
[Log In]
[Register]
- SnapShot Forum
- →
- THE LEARNING CENTER
- →
- The Schoolhouse
- →
- Previous assignments
- →
- Homework - Assignment #1
| We hope you enjoy your visit. You're currently viewing our forum as a guest. This means you are limited to certain areas of the board and there are some features you can't use. If you join our community, you'll be able to access member-only sections, and use many member-only features such as customizing your profile, sending personal messages, and voting in polls. Registration is simple, fast, and completely free. Join our community! If you're already a member please log in to your account to access all of our features: |
| Homework - Assignment #1 | |
|---|---|
| Topic Started: May 11 2006, 01:27 PM (1,186 Views) | |
| kman627 | May 11 2006, 01:27 PM Post #1 |
|
Unregistered
|
Please post your work for assignment #1 here. Remember, you can post as few as 1 or as many as 3 images. |
 
|
|
| kcdotnet | May 11 2006, 08:04 PM Post #2 |
Advocatus diaboli.
|
 D200 - 1/8 sec F22 - 20mm  D200 - 1.3 sec F22 - 20mm  And just to contrast the difference in aperture.... Might as well point out - the closer the focus point is to the lens, the shallower the Depth of Field for any given aperture is. f22 focusing at something 10ft from the lens will keep more in focus than f22 focusing on something 2ft from the lens. D200 - 1.3 sec F22 - 20mm  Yeah, yeah - this is 4 images when you said post only 3, but this one really isnt for homework - just making sure the difference in DOF is obvious with f22 vs f2.8. D200 - 1/50 sec F2.8 - 20mm 
|
 |
|
| kman627 | May 12 2006, 09:38 AM Post #3 |
|
Unregistered
|
Here's a little homework I did last night. I've also included an example of the comparison between the two spectrums of depth of field. 50mm f/22 30" ISO 200 Even at a short distance, you can get good depth of field if use a small enough aperture. But you will notice that it does lose sharpness a slight bit at each end. But below this I will compare it to one shot at f1.8.  50mm f/1.8 1/2" ISO 200 
|
|
|
|
| petmagnet | May 12 2006, 04:04 PM Post #4 |
 
|
Not sure if this what you are talking about or not. Not a good shot, anyway..but trying to get one up. *****Actually,it is a good shot pet! Very good use of shallow dof and it is an interesting subject. This would looks really good if you shoot it around dusk in order to ad a little color to it. - kman*****
|
|
|
|
| petmagnet | May 12 2006, 04:09 PM Post #5 |
|
A different one..Now tell the truth and make sure it's in words I understand, Please!!! :crazy: 
|
|
|
|
| kman627 | May 12 2006, 04:15 PM Post #6 |
|
Unregistered
|
Pet, You've definitley got a handle on the concept of DOF. The first one is a great example of shallow dof and the second one has a very large depth of field. Everything is clear, in focus, and sharp. You did a good job with the depth of field. As far as composition, you might want to try and mix things up a bit. The photo is very symetrical and centered. You might want to try and mix it up a little by shooting the field at an angle. You did a good job of this in the shallow dof one by shooting from closer to the ground. If you shoot near the ground, and at an angle, it will ad an extra element and visual style to your image. But as far as the depth of field goes for this lesson, you've done and great job and your images show that you have a good grasp of the concept. |
|
|
|
| stormluvr1 | May 12 2006, 04:29 PM Post #7 |
having a great time with new friends
|
Well here goes, this first one is for gretchen.  And here is one I have used on SOA just done differently and taken today. 
|
|
|
|
| kman627 | May 12 2006, 04:40 PM Post #8 |
|
Unregistered
|
Nice work storm. You have very good depth of field on the first one and the second one is good too. The second surprisingly has good dof, despite being shot at a short distance. But you too have a good grasp of the concept of dof. Nice work. |
|
|
|
| kman627 | May 12 2006, 04:41 PM Post #9 |
|
Unregistered
|
Students: I will be gone a lot of the weekend, but if you post your homework I will be sure to get to it first thing on Monday. Have a nice weekend everyone. |
|
|
|
| BlueIce | May 12 2006, 09:07 PM Post #10 |
~intrinsically damaged~
|
Okie, I probably have this all wrong, but here it is...  
|
|
|
|
| freagea231 | May 12 2006, 09:24 PM Post #11 |
|
 is this okay? 
|
|
|
|
| myworldit | May 13 2006, 01:08 PM Post #12 |
|
 bring on the "C"   
|
|
|
|
| BlueIce | May 13 2006, 07:20 PM Post #13 |
|
~intrinsically damaged~
|
|
|
|
|
| stzlbender | May 14 2006, 02:51 PM Post #14 |
 
|
After I took my "homework"k pictures...I think I realized what you really wanted. So I may have screwed up...dang it! No gold star for me! I think I need extra credit! All three of my pics are either f5.6 or f6...but anyway. Laurcy Belle...  My husband, Shawn...who wasn't very thrilled about modeling! But I think very hot...  And last but not least, Zeb...  I think what you were really wanting was the same pic at a different f stop, right? Duh! Maybe next week I'll do better! :grumpy: |
|
|
|
| tomatowoma | May 14 2006, 10:11 PM Post #15 |
|
Unregistered
|
ok, i think this is what you wanted. pics that are not blurry in the foreground or background and have a decent amt of distance between the two? the first one isnt blurry, just distorted from the raindrops on the car window. hubby thought i was crazy but i wasnt sure when i would get time to do my homework so i went for this.  i had so much fun that i made time to go to a park that overlooks cincinnati.....and yeah, i posterized it, but i think it still shows what you are looking for, sorry, the toma in me took over......if you dont want us to do that i wont. and if it was my only one, i wouldnt have done it.....but i get out of control....rofl!  and #3  kman, thanks so much for helping us think.......and being so nice about it! |
|
|
|
| 1 user reading this topic (1 Guest and 0 Anonymous) | |
| Go to Next Page | |
| « Previous Topic · Previous assignments · Next Topic » |
| Track Topic · E-mail Topic |
 8:50 AM Jan 7
|